Editorial Policy

Evidence standard

We prefer official product documentation, protocol documentation and other primary technical sources. Platform facts are separated from general mechanics, hypothetical examples and editorial interpretation. Changeable details should be rechecked and dated.

Testing and visual evidence

Articles must not invent testing, release notes, security audits, testimonials, prices or trading outcomes. Editorial illustrations and AI-generated dashboard concepts must be labelled as concepts and must not be described as live platform screenshots or real account data.

Corrections and updates

Material factual errors should be corrected promptly, with the content date updated where appropriate. The current contact page accurately reports that no monitored correction channel has yet been configured; this remains a launch blocker.

Commercial independence

Affiliate relationships are disclosed near relevant links. A commission does not justify unsupported claims, preferential conclusions or omission of material risks. Editorial comparisons should explain their evidence and uncertainty rather than declare a universal winner.

Review responsibility

Human review remains necessary for legal, financial-risk and rapidly changing product claims. Publication does not certify that a page is legal advice or that a third-party service is safe.